Our Work
| Inclusive SA | Our Work | State Disability Inclusion Plan

Data methodology and limitations

In the first year of reporting, data collected will serve as a baseline. This foundational data is critical as it provides the starting point from which we can measure progress over time. Once the baseline is established, we will be in a stronger position to consider meaningful and evidence-based targets, likely to coincide with the first review of the State Plan in two years’ time.

At each reporting stage, we will collect and analyse both quantitative data (numbers) and qualitative data (experiences and stories). This mixed-method approach ensures we capture what is happening, as well as how people are experiencing it. Listening to people with lived experience of disability is central to this process, helping to make sense of the data and understand the real-world impact of actions.

There are, however, several limitations to be aware of when interpreting the data.

  • Disability disclosure is not mandatory, which means some data may not fully represent the number or diversity of people with disability.
  • Measuring outcomes for people with disability is complex, particularly when trying to capture personal, social and systemic change. Changes, such as policy reform or increased feelings of inclusion, are often qualitative and may take time to emerge. Multiple factors, including social attitudes and intersectionality, can also make it difficult to link progress to specific programs. To address this, we will use both quantitative and qualitative data to ensure outcomes are measured in meaningful and accurate ways.
  • Disaggregated data such as age, gender, Aboriginal status or cultural background may not always be available. However, we will work to include this where possible through state authority DAIP actions and reporting, with a focus on capturing data related to priority groups.

We are committed to culturally safe and respectful data practices, especially in relation to Aboriginal peoples. This includes upholding principles of data sovereignty and ensuring that data is used in ways that empower and support communities.

We also recognise that population-level change takes time. However, through consistent measurement and focus on the State Plan’s outcomes, we aim to influence long-term improvements and help create a new normal—one where inclusion and accessibility are the standard, not the exception.